What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Chile and Costa Rica?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Costa Rica: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Chile

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Costa Rica

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Chile rank

137th

Costa Rica rank

139th

Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Chile
Costa Rica

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Chile ranks 137th and Costa Rica ranks 139th of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Costa Rica	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0008 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
1970s	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Chile
1980s	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Chile
1990s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Chile or Costa Rica?: Chile, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Costa Rica as of 2025.
What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Chile and Costa Rica?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Chile ranks 137th and Costa Rica ranks 139th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Costa Rica: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/costa-rica/">Chile vs Costa Rica: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Cropland extent over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.