What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cuba?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cuba?

31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cuba: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Cuba

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2020

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

77th

Cuba rank

78th

Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Cuba

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 77th and Cuba ranks 78th of 188 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Cuba	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Cuba?: Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2025.
What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cuba?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cuba?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cuba rank globally for cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 77th and Cuba ranks 78th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cuba: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/cuba/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cuba: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Cropland extent over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.