What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Belgium and New Caledonia?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Belgium ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Caledonia?

60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs New Caledonia: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Belgium

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

New Caledonia

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Belgium rank

160th

New Caledonia rank

161st

Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Belgium
New Caledonia

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Belgium ranks 160th and New Caledonia ranks 161st of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
1970s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
1980s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
1990s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Belgium
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Belgium
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Belgium or New Caledonia?: Belgium, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Belgium and New Caledonia?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Caledonia?: 60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do Belgium and New Caledonia rank globally for cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Belgium ranks 160th and New Caledonia ranks 161st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs New Caledonia: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/new-caledonia/">Belgium vs New Caledonia: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Cropland extent over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.