What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Barbados and South Korea?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Barbados ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and South Korea?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs South Korea: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Barbados

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

South Korea

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Barbados rank

164th

South Korea rank

166th

Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Barbados
South Korea

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in South Korea, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times South Korea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was South Korea ahead.

Barbados ranks 164th and South Korea ranks 166th of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 4 and South Korea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	South Korea	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP	South Korea
1970s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	South Korea
1980s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	South Korea
1990s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Barbados
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Barbados
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Barbados
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Barbados or South Korea?: Barbados, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in South Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Barbados and South Korea?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and South Korea?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Barbados and South Korea rank globally for cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Barbados ranks 164th and South Korea ranks 166th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs South Korea: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/korea-rep/">Barbados vs South Korea: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Cropland extent over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.