Ecuador vs Maldives: Credit to Fishery — Value US$
Credit to Fishery — Value US$ over time
- Ecuador
- Maldives
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 34.9 million USD against 31.35 million USD in Maldives, a difference of 3.55 million USD.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Maldives ahead.
Ecuador ranks 12th and Maldives ranks 14th of 43 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.58 million USD | 80.05 million USD | 70.47 million USD | Maldives |
| 2010s | 30.44 million USD | 44.07 million USD | 13.63 million USD | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to fishery — value us$, Ecuador or Maldives?
- Ecuador, at 34.9 million USD against 31.35 million USD in Maldives as of 2014.
- What is the difference in credit to fishery — value us$ between Ecuador and Maldives?
- 3.55 million USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Maldives?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
- How do Ecuador and Maldives rank globally for credit to fishery — value us$?
- Ecuador ranks 12th and Maldives ranks 14th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Fishery — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.