Brazil vs Ethiopia: Credit to Agriculture — Value Standard Local Currency
Credit to Agriculture — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Brazil
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 52,003 million SLC against 40,093 million SLC in Brazil, a difference of 11,910 million SLC.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.3 times Brazil's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 20th and Ethiopia ranks 17th of 59 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 27,470 million SLC | 18,575 million SLC | 8,894 million SLC | Brazil |
| 2020s | 36,800 million SLC | 26,455 million SLC | 10,345 million SLC | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to agriculture — value standard local currency, Brazil or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 52,003 million SLC against 40,093 million SLC in Brazil as of 2022.
- What is the difference in credit to agriculture — value standard local currency between Brazil and Ethiopia?
- 11,910 million SLC, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ethiopia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and Ethiopia rank globally for credit to agriculture — value standard local currency?
- Brazil ranks 20th and Ethiopia ranks 17th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.