Argentina vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture and Fishery — Value Standard Local Currency

Argentina
422,193 million SLC
in 2020
United Republic of Tanzania
1.76 million million SLC
in 2020
Argentina rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
1st

Credit to Agriculture and Fishery — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • Argentina
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M199220062020

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 1.76 million million SLC against 422,193 million SLC in Argentina, a difference of 1.34 million million SLC.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 4.2 times Argentina's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st of 33 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 13,244 million SLC 404,247 million SLC 391,003 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 108,388 million SLC 1.13 million million SLC 1.02 million million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 422,193 million SLC 1.76 million million SLC 1.34 million million SLC United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture and fishery — value standard local currency, Argentina or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 1.76 million million SLC against 422,193 million SLC in Argentina as of 2020.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture and fishery — value standard local currency between Argentina and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.34 million million SLC, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and United Republic of Tanzania?
15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
How do Argentina and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for credit to agriculture and fishery — value standard local currency?
Argentina ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st of 33 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture and Fishery — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture and Fishery — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-and-fishery-value-standard-local-currency/argentina/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-and-fishery-value-standard-local-currency/argentina/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Argentina vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture and Fishery — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture and Fishery — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
35 places, 783 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.