Iceland vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on

Iceland
1
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
75
in 2025
Iceland rank
4th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
2nd

Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on over time

  • Iceland
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
020406080201220182025

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 75 against 1 in Iceland, a difference of 74.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 75.0 times Iceland's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 4th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd of 264 countries.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 1 64.12 63.12 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 1 73.33 72.33 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher countries that are contracting parties to the international treaty on, Iceland or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 75 against 1 in Iceland as of 2025.
What is the difference in countries that are contracting parties to the international treaty on between Iceland and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
74, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for countries that are contracting parties to the international treaty on?
Iceland ranks 4th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd of 264 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/countries-that-are-contracting-parties-to-the-international-treaty-on-plant-genetic/iceland/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/countries-that-are-contracting-parties-to-the-international-treaty-on-plant-genetic/iceland/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Iceland vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
303 places, 4,240 data points, 2012–2025
Last refreshed