Australia and New Zealand vs Slovenia: Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on
Australia and New Zealand
1
in 2025
Slovenia
1
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
4th
Slovenia rank
4th
Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Slovenia
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 1 against 1 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Slovenia ranks 4th of 264 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher countries that are contracting parties to the international treaty on, Australia and New Zealand or Slovenia?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 1 against 1 in Slovenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in countries that are contracting parties to the international treaty on between Australia and New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 0, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Slovenia rank globally for countries that are contracting parties to the international treaty on?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Slovenia ranks 4th of 264 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.