Afghanistan vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on

Afghanistan
1
in 2025
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
41
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
4th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
5th

Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
010203040201220182025

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 41 against 1 in Afghanistan, a difference of 40.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 41.0 times Afghanistan's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 4th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 5th of 264 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 1 37.5 36.5 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 1 40.5 39.5 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher countries that are contracting parties to the international treaty on, Afghanistan or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 41 against 1 in Afghanistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in countries that are contracting parties to the international treaty on between Afghanistan and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
40, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
How do Afghanistan and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for countries that are contracting parties to the international treaty on?
Afghanistan ranks 4th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 5th of 264 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/countries-that-are-contracting-parties-to-the-international-treaty-on-plant-genetic/afghanistan/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/countries-that-are-contracting-parties-to-the-international-treaty-on-plant-genetic/afghanistan/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Afghanistan vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
303 places, 4,240 data points, 2012–2025
Last refreshed