Nepal vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Cottonseed — Stock Variation

Nepal
80 t
in 2013
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
200 t
in 2013
Nepal rank
10th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
8th

Cottonseed — Stock Variation over time

  • Nepal
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-10.0k010.0k20.0k30.0k196119872013

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 200 t against 80 t in Nepal, a difference of 120 t.

That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 2.5 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

Nepal ranks 10th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 8th of 66 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t -111.11 t 111.11 t Nepal
1970s 0 t 100 t 100 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1980s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1990s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2000s 0 t -60 t 60 t Nepal
2010s 0 t 150 t 150 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cottonseed — stock variation, Nepal or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 200 t against 80 t in Nepal as of 2013.
What is the difference in cottonseed — stock variation between Nepal and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
120 t, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Nepal and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for cottonseed — stock variation?
Nepal ranks 10th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 8th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cottonseed — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Cottonseed — Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-stock-variation/nepal/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-stock-variation/nepal/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Nepal vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Cottonseed — Stock Variation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cottonseed — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
99 places, 4,949 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.