Land Locked Developing Countries vs USSR: Cottonseed β€” Stock Variation

Land Locked Developing Countries
65,580 t
in 2013
USSR
100,000 t
in 1991
Land Locked Developing Countries rank
4th
USSR rank
2nd

Cottonseed β€” Stock Variation over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries
  • USSR
-400.0k-200.0k0200.0k400.0k196119872013

How they compare

USSR currently reports 100,000 t against 65,580 t in Land Locked Developing Countries, a difference of 34,420 t.

That makes USSR's figure about 1.5 times Land Locked Developing Countries's.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Land Locked Developing Countries ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 4th and USSR ranks 2nd of 31 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries averaged higher in 1 and USSR in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries USSR Difference Ahead
1960s -9,939 t 0 t 9,939 t USSR
1970s 650 t 0 t 650 t Land Locked Developing Countries
1980s -9,405 t 0 t 9,405 t USSR
1990s -5,025 t 0 t 5,025 t USSR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cottonseed β€” stock variation, Land Locked Developing Countries or USSR?
USSR, at 100,000 t against 65,580 t in Land Locked Developing Countries as of 1991.
What is the difference in cottonseed β€” stock variation between Land Locked Developing Countries and USSR?
34,420 t, with USSR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries and USSR?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries and USSR rank globally for cottonseed β€” stock variation?
Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 4th and USSR ranks 2nd of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cottonseed β€” Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries vs USSR: Cottonseed β€” Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-stock-variation/land-locked-developing-countries/ussr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-stock-variation/land-locked-developing-countries/ussr/">Land Locked Developing Countries vs USSR: Cottonseed β€” Stock Variation</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cottonseed β€” Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
99 places, 4,949 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.