Sri Lanka vs St. Vincent and the Grenadines: Cottonseed β€” Processing

Sri Lanka
0 t
in 2013
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
0 t
in 2013
Sri Lanka rank
87th
St. Vincent and the Grenadines rank
87th

Cottonseed β€” Processing over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • St. Vincent and the Grenadines
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119872013

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 t against 0 t in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 87th and St. Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 87th of 93 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1960s 854.44 t 100.33 t 754.11 t Sri Lanka
1970s 3,462 t 5.5 t 3,456 t Sri Lanka
1980s 1,076 t 0 t 1,076 t Sri Lanka
1990s 0.6 t 0 t 0.6 t Sri Lanka
2000s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cottonseed β€” processing, Sri Lanka or St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
Sri Lanka, at 0 t against 0 t in St. Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2013.
What is the difference in cottonseed β€” processing between Sri Lanka and St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
0 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Sri Lanka and St. Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for cottonseed β€” processing?
Sri Lanka ranks 87th and St. Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 87th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cottonseed β€” Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs St. Vincent and the Grenadines: Cottonseed β€” Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-processing/sri-lanka/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-processing/sri-lanka/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Sri Lanka vs St. Vincent and the Grenadines: Cottonseed β€” Processing</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cottonseed β€” Processing
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
131 places, 6,606 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.