Low Income Food Deficit Countries vs Uzbekistan: Cottonseed — Processing

Low Income Food Deficit Countries
11.89 million t
in 2013
Uzbekistan
1.55 million t
in 2013
Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank
2nd
Uzbekistan rank
6th

Cottonseed — Processing over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries
  • Uzbekistan
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119872013

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries currently reports 11.89 million t against 1.55 million t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 10.34 million t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries's figure about 7.7 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 2nd and Uzbekistan ranks 6th of 28 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 8.02 million t 1.66 million t 6.36 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
2000s 9.00 million t 1.63 million t 7.37 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
2010s 11.87 million t 1.55 million t 10.31 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cottonseed — processing, Low Income Food Deficit Countries or Uzbekistan?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries, at 11.89 million t against 1.55 million t in Uzbekistan as of 2013.
What is the difference in cottonseed — processing between Low Income Food Deficit Countries and Uzbekistan?
10.34 million t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries and Uzbekistan?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries and Uzbekistan rank globally for cottonseed — processing?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 2nd and Uzbekistan ranks 6th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cottonseed — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries vs Uzbekistan: Cottonseed — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-processing/low-income-food-deficit-countries/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-processing/low-income-food-deficit-countries/uzbekistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries vs Uzbekistan: Cottonseed — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cottonseed — Processing
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
131 places, 6,606 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.