Australia and New Zealand vs C�te d'Ivoire: Cottonseed — Other uses

Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2013
C�te d'Ivoire
0 t
in 2013
Australia and New Zealand rank
37th
C�te d'Ivoire rank
37th

Cottonseed — Other uses over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • C�te d'Ivoire
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119872013

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 t against 0 t in C�te d'Ivoire, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was C�te d'Ivoire ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 37th and C�te d'Ivoire ranks 37th of 59 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and C�te d'Ivoire in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand C�te d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1970s 0 t 4.5 t 4.5 t C�te d'Ivoire
1980s 148.3 t 0 t 148.3 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 241.2 t 0 t 241.2 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 287.4 t 0 t 287.4 t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cottonseed — other uses, Australia and New Zealand or C�te d'Ivoire?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0 t against 0 t in C�te d'Ivoire as of 2013.
What is the difference in cottonseed — other uses between Australia and New Zealand and C�te d'Ivoire?
0 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and C�te d'Ivoire?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and New Zealand and C�te d'Ivoire rank globally for cottonseed — other uses?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 37th and C�te d'Ivoire ranks 37th of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cottonseed — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs C�te d'Ivoire: Cottonseed — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-other-uses-non-food/australia-and-new-zealand/c-te-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-other-uses-non-food/australia-and-new-zealand/c-te-d-ivoire/">Australia and New Zealand vs C�te d'Ivoire: Cottonseed — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cottonseed — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,544 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.