Central America vs Georgia: Cotton lint — Stock Variation
Cotton lint — Stock Variation over time
- Central America
- Georgia
How they compare
Central America currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Georgia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Central America ranks 16th and Georgia ranks 15th of 27 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central America averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2000s | -75 t | 0 t | 75 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 187.5 t | 0 t | 187.5 t | Central America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cotton lint — stock variation, Central America or Georgia?
- Central America, at 0 t against 0 t in Georgia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cotton lint — stock variation between Central America and Georgia?
- 0 t, with Central America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Georgia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do Central America and Georgia rank globally for cotton lint — stock variation?
- Central America ranks 16th and Georgia ranks 15th of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cotton lint — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.