Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries: Cotton lint — Stock Variation

Australia and New Zealand
156,000 t
in 2013
Land Locked Developing Countries
74,500 t
in 2013
Australia and New Zealand rank
1st
Land Locked Developing Countries rank
1st

Cotton lint — Stock Variation over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Land Locked Developing Countries
-200.0k-100.0k0100.0k200.0k196119872013

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 156,000 t against 74,500 t in Land Locked Developing Countries, a difference of 81,500 t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 2.1 times Land Locked Developing Countries's.

The two have swapped places 27 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Land Locked Developing Countries ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 1st of 66 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Land Locked Developing Countries in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Land Locked Developing Countries Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t -4,500 t 4,500 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 0 t -7,460 t 7,460 t Australia and New Zealand
1980s -6,000 t -14,460 t 8,460 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s -19,900 t -35,420 t 15,520 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 15,600 t 45,508 t 29,908 t Land Locked Developing Countries
2010s 25,750 t -12,125 t 37,875 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cotton lint — stock variation, Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries?
Australia and New Zealand, at 156,000 t against 74,500 t in Land Locked Developing Countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in cotton lint — stock variation between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries?
81,500 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries rank globally for cotton lint — stock variation?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 1st of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cotton lint — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries: Cotton lint — Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cotton-lint-stock-variation/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cotton-lint-stock-variation/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries/">Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries: Cotton lint — Stock Variation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cotton lint — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
100 places, 4,792 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.