Australia and New Zealand vs Guyana: Cotton lint — Import Quantity

Australia and New Zealand
8 t
in 2013
Guyana
12 t
in 2013
Australia and New Zealand rank
105th
Guyana rank
104th

Cotton lint — Import Quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Guyana
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119872013

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 12 t against 8 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 4 t.

That makes Guyana's figure about 1.5 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 105th and Guyana ranks 104th of 148 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Guyana Difference Ahead
1960s 16,443 t 0 t 16,443 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 5,278 t 0.3 t 5,278 t Australia and New Zealand
1980s 1,214 t 117.3 t 1,097 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 127.4 t 86.8 t 40.6 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 62.6 t 3 t 59.6 t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 68.75 t 8 t 60.75 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cotton lint — import quantity, Australia and New Zealand or Guyana?
Guyana, at 12 t against 8 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2013.
What is the difference in cotton lint — import quantity between Australia and New Zealand and Guyana?
4 t, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Guyana?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Guyana rank globally for cotton lint — import quantity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 105th and Guyana ranks 104th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cotton lint — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Guyana: Cotton lint — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cotton-lint-import-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cotton-lint-import-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/guyana/">Australia and New Zealand vs Guyana: Cotton lint — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cotton lint — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
189 places, 9,072 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.