Ecuador vs Namibia: Cotton lint, ginned — Stock Variation

Ecuador
0 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 t
in 2023
Ecuador rank
21st
Namibia rank
21st

Cotton lint, ginned — Stock Variation over time

  • Ecuador
  • Namibia
-8-6-4-20201420182023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 21st and Namibia ranks 21st of 170 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t -1.23 t 1.23 t Ecuador
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cotton lint, ginned — stock variation, Ecuador or Namibia?
Ecuador, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cotton lint, ginned — stock variation between Ecuador and Namibia?
0 t, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for cotton lint, ginned — stock variation?
Ecuador ranks 21st and Namibia ranks 21st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cotton lint, ginned — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Cotton lint, ginned — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
201 places, 2,195 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.