China, Hong Kong SAR vs Latvia: Cotton lint, ginned — Stock Variation
China, Hong Kong SAR
-20.83 t
in 2023
Latvia
-217.72 t
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
127th
Latvia rank
129th
Cotton lint, ginned — Stock Variation over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Latvia
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -20.83 t against -217.72 t in Latvia, a difference of 196.89 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Latvia ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 127th and Latvia ranks 129th of 153 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -19.02 t | 0 t | 19.02 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | -25.2 t | -54.43 t | 29.23 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cotton lint, ginned — stock variation, China, Hong Kong SAR or Latvia?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at -20.83 t against -217.72 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cotton lint, ginned — stock variation between China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
- 196.89 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia rank globally for cotton lint, ginned — stock variation?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 127th and Latvia ranks 129th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cotton lint, ginned — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.