Australia vs Latvia: Cotton lint, ginned — Residuals
Australia
0 t
in 2023
Latvia
0 t
in 2023
Australia rank
2nd
Latvia rank
2nd
Cotton lint, ginned — Residuals over time
- Australia
- Latvia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Latvia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Latvia ahead.
Australia ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 2nd of 160 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -94,281 t | -9.3 t | 94,272 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | -44,274 t | 0 t | 44,274 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cotton lint, ginned — residuals, Australia or Latvia?
- Australia, at 0 t against 0 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cotton lint, ginned — residuals between Australia and Latvia?
- 0 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for cotton lint, ginned — residuals?
- Australia ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 2nd of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cotton lint, ginned — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.