Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cotton lint — Export Quantity

Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 t
in 2013
Trinidad and Tobago
0 t
in 2013
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
102nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
102nd

Cotton lint — Export Quantity over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Trinidad and Tobago
020406080196119872013

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 102nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 102nd of 140 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 46.44 t 0 t 46.44 t Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 11.9 t 0 t 11.9 t Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 5.7 t 0 t 5.7 t Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2000s 0 t 5.8 t 5.8 t Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cotton lint — export quantity, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Trinidad and Tobago?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0 t against 0 t in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2013.
What is the difference in cotton lint — export quantity between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 t, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for cotton lint — export quantity?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 102nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 102nd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cotton lint — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cotton lint — Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cotton-lint-export-quantity/st-kitts-and-nevis/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cotton-lint-export-quantity/st-kitts-and-nevis/trinidad-and-tobago/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cotton lint — Export Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cotton lint — Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
178 places, 8,495 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.