Australia and New Zealand vs Togo: Cotton lint — Domestic supply quantity

Australia and New Zealand
302 t
in 2013
Togo
296 t
in 2013
Australia and New Zealand rank
102nd
Togo rank
104th

Cotton lint — Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Togo
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119872013

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 302 t against 296 t in Togo, a difference of 6 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 102nd and Togo ranks 104th of 155 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Togo Difference Ahead
1960s 28,128 t 44.67 t 28,083 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 26,390 t 32.4 t 26,358 t Australia and New Zealand
1980s 31,871 t 67.4 t 31,803 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 21,078 t 99.1 t 20,979 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 680.5 t 97.3 t 583.2 t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 469.25 t 269 t 200.25 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cotton lint — domestic supply quantity, Australia and New Zealand or Togo?
Australia and New Zealand, at 302 t against 296 t in Togo as of 2013.
What is the difference in cotton lint — domestic supply quantity between Australia and New Zealand and Togo?
6 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Togo?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Togo rank globally for cotton lint — domestic supply quantity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 102nd and Togo ranks 104th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cotton lint — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Togo: Cotton lint — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cotton-lint-domestic-supply-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cotton-lint-domestic-supply-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/togo/">Australia and New Zealand vs Togo: Cotton lint — Domestic supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cotton lint — Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
197 places, 9,432 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.