Armenia vs Madagascar: Cotton lint — Domestic supply quantity
Cotton lint — Domestic supply quantity over time
- Armenia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 69 t against 66 t in Armenia, a difference of 3 t.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 114th and Madagascar ranks 113th of 155 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 713.12 t | 11,444 t | 10,731 t | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 139.8 t | 5,434 t | 5,294 t | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 121.25 t | 3,426 t | 3,304 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cotton lint — domestic supply quantity, Armenia or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 69 t against 66 t in Armenia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cotton lint — domestic supply quantity between Armenia and Madagascar?
- 3 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Madagascar?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do Armenia and Madagascar rank globally for cotton lint — domestic supply quantity?
- Armenia ranks 114th and Madagascar ranks 113th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cotton lint — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.