Least Developed Countries vs Mozambique: Copra Cake — Feed

Least Developed Countries
58,856 t
in 2013
Mozambique
14,130 t
in 2013
Least Developed Countries rank
11th
Mozambique rank
14th

Copra Cake — Feed over time

  • Least Developed Countries
  • Mozambique
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119872013

How they compare

Least Developed Countries currently reports 58,856 t against 14,130 t in Mozambique, a difference of 44,726 t.

That makes Least Developed Countries's figure about 4.2 times Mozambique's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries ranks 11th and Mozambique ranks 14th of 31 groups.

Least Developed Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 13,148 t 61 t 13,087 t Least Developed Countries
1970s 20,738 t 3,764 t 16,974 t Least Developed Countries
1980s 42,628 t 18,156 t 24,471 t Least Developed Countries
1990s 64,769 t 19,045 t 45,724 t Least Developed Countries
2000s 53,820 t 11,669 t 42,151 t Least Developed Countries
2010s 49,208 t 9,096 t 40,113 t Least Developed Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher copra cake — feed, Least Developed Countries or Mozambique?
Least Developed Countries, at 58,856 t against 14,130 t in Mozambique as of 2013.
What is the difference in copra cake — feed between Least Developed Countries and Mozambique?
44,726 t, with Least Developed Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries and Mozambique?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Least Developed Countries and Mozambique rank globally for copra cake — feed?
Least Developed Countries ranks 11th and Mozambique ranks 14th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Copra Cake — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries vs Mozambique: Copra Cake — Feed. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/copra-cake-feed/least-developed-countries/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/copra-cake-feed/least-developed-countries/mozambique/">Least Developed Countries vs Mozambique: Copra Cake — Feed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Copra Cake — Feed
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
163 places, 8,069 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.