Mongolia vs North Macedonia: Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution
Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution over time
- Mongolia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.22 No against 0.22 No in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 No.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 100th and North Macedonia ranks 100th of 154 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2589 No | 0.22 No | 0.0389 No | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.247 No | 0.217 No | 0.03 No | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.242 No | 0.232 No | 0.01 No | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution, Mongolia or North Macedonia?
- Mongolia, at 0.22 No against 0.22 No in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution between Mongolia and North Macedonia?
- 0 No, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and North Macedonia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Mongolia and North Macedonia rank globally for coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution?
- Mongolia ranks 100th and North Macedonia ranks 100th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution (real number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.