Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution

Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.39 No
in 2024
Syrian Arab Republic
0.4 No
in 2024
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
2nd
Syrian Arab Republic rank
1st

Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Syrian Arab Republic
00.10.20.30.4200120122024

How they compare

Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 0.4 No against 0.39 No in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 0.01 No.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 1st of 12 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 2 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 0.37 No 0.2811 No 0.0889 No Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 0.37 No 0.331 No 0.039 No Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 0.382 No 0.4 No 0.018 No Syrian Arab Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Syrian Arab Republic?
Syrian Arab Republic, at 0.4 No against 0.39 No in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
0.01 No, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 1st of 12 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution (real number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/coefficient-of-variation-of-habitual-caloric-consumption-distribution-real-number-value/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/coefficient-of-variation-of-habitual-caloric-consumption-distribution-real-number-value/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution (real number) — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 4,014 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.