Chile vs Malta: Coconuts - Incl Copra — Feed
Coconuts - Incl Copra — Feed over time
- Chile
- Malta
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Malta, a difference of 0 1000 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 48th and Malta ranks 48th of 126 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 1 1000 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.5 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0.5 1000 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coconuts - incl copra — feed, Chile or Malta?
- Chile, at 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coconuts - incl copra — feed between Chile and Malta?
- 0 1000 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Malta rank globally for coconuts - incl copra — feed?
- Chile ranks 48th and Malta ranks 48th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coconuts - Incl Copra — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.