Kazakhstan vs Malta: Citrus Fruit, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Kazakhstan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malta
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
116th
Malta rank
118th
Citrus Fruit, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Kazakhstan
- Malta
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Malta, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 116th and Malta ranks 118th of 137 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher citrus fruit, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Kazakhstan or Malta?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in citrus fruit, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Kazakhstan and Malta?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malta?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Malta rank globally for citrus fruit, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Kazakhstan ranks 116th and Malta ranks 118th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Citrus Fruit, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Citrus Fruit, Total — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.