Croatia vs Namibia: Citrus Fruit, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Croatia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Croatia rank
93rd
Namibia rank
96th
Citrus Fruit, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Croatia
- Namibia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 96th of 137 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher citrus fruit, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Croatia or Namibia?
- Croatia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in citrus fruit, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Croatia and Namibia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Namibia rank globally for citrus fruit, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Croatia ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 96th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Citrus Fruit, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Citrus Fruit, Total — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.