Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Chickens — Stocks, per square kilometre

Eswatini
0.1157 1000 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.1231 1000 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
106th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
104th

Chickens — Stocks, per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.1231 1000 An per square kilometre against 0.1157 1000 An per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0074 1000 An per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Eswatini ranks 106th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 104th of 168 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0191 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1546 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1355 1000 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0277 1000 An per square kilometre 0.2043 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1765 1000 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0465 1000 An per square kilometre 0.2858 1000 An per square kilometre 0.2393 1000 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0608 1000 An per square kilometre 0.2296 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1688 1000 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0922 1000 An per square kilometre 0.2577 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1655 1000 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.1062 1000 An per square kilometre 0.2658 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1596 1000 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.1094 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1221 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0127 1000 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — stocks, per square kilometre, Eswatini or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.1231 1000 An per square kilometre against 0.1157 1000 An per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — stocks, per square kilometre between Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0074 1000 An per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for chickens — stocks, per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 106th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 104th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Chickens — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-stocks-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-stocks-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Chickens — Stocks, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Stocks, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,643 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Chickens — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.