Lithuania vs South Sudan: Chickens — Stocks, per capita
Lithuania
0.0036 1000 An per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0.0036 1000 An per person
in 2024
Lithuania rank
52nd
South Sudan rank
53rd
Chickens — Stocks, per capita over time
- Lithuania
- South Sudan
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0036 1000 An per person against 0.0036 1000 An per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 1000 An per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 52nd and South Sudan ranks 53rd of 168 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0034 1000 An per person | 0.0022 1000 An per person | 0.0011 1000 An per person | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.0033 1000 An per person | 0.0034 1000 An per person | 0.0001 1000 An per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chickens — stocks, per capita, Lithuania or South Sudan?
- Lithuania, at 0.0036 1000 An per person against 0.0036 1000 An per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in chickens — stocks, per capita between Lithuania and South Sudan?
- 0 1000 An per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and South Sudan rank globally for chickens — stocks, per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 52nd and South Sudan ranks 53rd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens — Stocks, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chickens — Stocks divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.