China vs Lithuania: Chickens — Stocks, per capita
China
0.0038 1000 An per person
in 2024
Lithuania
0.0036 1000 An per person
in 2024
China rank
49th
Lithuania rank
52nd
Chickens — Stocks, per capita over time
- China
- Lithuania
How they compare
China currently reports 0.0038 1000 An per person against 0.0036 1000 An per person in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0002 1000 An per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
China ranks 49th and Lithuania ranks 52nd of 168 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0026 1000 An per person | 0.0025 1000 An per person | 0.0001 1000 An per person | China |
| 2000s | 0.0033 1000 An per person | 0.0023 1000 An per person | 0.001 1000 An per person | China |
| 2010s | 0.0036 1000 An per person | 0.0033 1000 An per person | 0.0003 1000 An per person | China |
| 2020s | 0.0038 1000 An per person | 0.0033 1000 An per person | 0.0005 1000 An per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chickens — stocks, per capita, China or Lithuania?
- China, at 0.0038 1000 An per person against 0.0036 1000 An per person in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in chickens — stocks, per capita between China and Lithuania?
- 0.0002 1000 An per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Lithuania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do China and Lithuania rank globally for chickens — stocks, per capita?
- China ranks 49th and Lithuania ranks 52nd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens — Stocks, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chickens — Stocks divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.