Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Index Number

Australia and New Zealand
198.05
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
85.25
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
7th

Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Index Number over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
050100150200196119922024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 198.05 against 85.25 in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 112.8.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 2.3 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 7th of 50 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1980s 4.47 32.07 27.61 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1990s 17.83 29.23 11.4 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 21.67 51.59 29.92 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 65.94 95.32 29.38 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 99.36 87.08 12.29 Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chick peas, dry — gross production index number, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 198.05 against 85.25 in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in chick peas, dry — gross production index number between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
112.8, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
42 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for chick peas, dry — gross production index number?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 7th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Index Number. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/chick-peas-dry-gross-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/chick-peas-dry-gross-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Index Number</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
83 places, 4,211 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.