Libya vs Pakistan: Chick peas, dry — Gross per capita Production Index Number
Libya
41.99
in 2024
Pakistan
50.87
in 2024
Libya rank
44th
Pakistan rank
42nd
Chick peas, dry — Gross per capita Production Index Number over time
- Libya
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 50.87 against 41.99 in Libya, a difference of 8.88.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 44th and Pakistan ranks 42nd of 50 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,045 | 703.87 | 341.39 | Libya |
| 1970s | 809.58 | 500.66 | 308.92 | Libya |
| 1980s | 368.67 | 275.75 | 92.93 | Libya |
| 1990s | 420.61 | 259.09 | 161.52 | Libya |
| 2000s | 368.95 | 210.53 | 158.42 | Libya |
| 2010s | 120.52 | 121.81 | 1.28 | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 73.76 | 75.9 | 2.14 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chick peas, dry — gross per capita production index number, Libya or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 50.87 against 41.99 in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in chick peas, dry — gross per capita production index number between Libya and Pakistan?
- 8.88, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Pakistan?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Pakistan rank globally for chick peas, dry — gross per capita production index number?
- Libya ranks 44th and Pakistan ranks 42nd of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chick peas, dry — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.