Cuba vs Iceland: Change of cereal yield and land used for cereal production
Cuba
1.95 tonnes per hectare
in 2024
Iceland
1.97 tonnes per hectare
in 2024
Cuba rank
126th
Iceland rank
123rd
Change of cereal yield and land used for cereal production over time
- Cuba
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1.97 tonnes per hectare against 1.95 tonnes per hectare in Cuba, a difference of 0.02 tonnes per hectare.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Iceland ahead.
Cuba ranks 126th and Iceland ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.89 tonnes per hectare | 3.22 tonnes per hectare | 0.3294 tonnes per hectare | Iceland |
| 2020s | 2.09 tonnes per hectare | 3.07 tonnes per hectare | 0.9796 tonnes per hectare | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change of cereal yield and land used for cereal production, Cuba or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 1.97 tonnes per hectare against 1.95 tonnes per hectare in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change of cereal yield and land used for cereal production between Cuba and Iceland?
- 0.02 tonnes per hectare, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Iceland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Iceland rank globally for change of cereal yield and land used for cereal production?
- Cuba ranks 126th and Iceland ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change of cereal yield and land used for cereal production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in tonnes per hectare.