Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Tunisia
41.87 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Zimbabwe
39.11 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Tunisia rank
75th
Zimbabwe rank
76th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Tunisia
  • Zimbabwe
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 41.87 billion kilocalories per day against 39.11 billion kilocalories per day in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.76 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Tunisia ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 191 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 10.38 billion kilocalories per day 9.68 billion kilocalories per day 697.49 million kilocalories per day Tunisia
1970s 14.64 billion kilocalories per day 13.97 billion kilocalories per day 669.91 million kilocalories per day Tunisia
1980s 21.61 billion kilocalories per day 18.48 billion kilocalories per day 3.13 billion kilocalories per day Tunisia
1990s 28.32 billion kilocalories per day 22.71 billion kilocalories per day 5.61 billion kilocalories per day Tunisia
2000s 32.62 billion kilocalories per day 26.12 billion kilocalories per day 6.50 billion kilocalories per day Tunisia
2010s 38.28 billion kilocalories per day 30.76 billion kilocalories per day 7.52 billion kilocalories per day Tunisia
2020s 42.17 billion kilocalories per day 36.91 billion kilocalories per day 5.26 billion kilocalories per day Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Tunisia or Zimbabwe?
Tunisia, at 41.87 billion kilocalories per day against 39.11 billion kilocalories per day in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
2.76 billion kilocalories per day, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tunisia and Zimbabwe rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Tunisia ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/tunisia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/tunisia/zimbabwe/">Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.