South Africa vs Tanzania: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

South Africa
170.29 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Tanzania
167.76 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
South Africa rank
26th
Tanzania rank
27th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
050.0B100.0B150.0B196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 170.29 billion kilocalories per day against 167.76 billion kilocalories per day in Tanzania, a difference of 2.52 billion kilocalories per day.

Across all 63 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 26th and Tanzania ranks 27th of 191 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 54.37 billion kilocalories per day 20.40 billion kilocalories per day 33.96 billion kilocalories per day South Africa
1970s 72.35 billion kilocalories per day 31.62 billion kilocalories per day 40.73 billion kilocalories per day South Africa
1980s 93.16 billion kilocalories per day 48.32 billion kilocalories per day 44.84 billion kilocalories per day South Africa
1990s 114.99 billion kilocalories per day 61.51 billion kilocalories per day 53.48 billion kilocalories per day South Africa
2000s 139.99 billion kilocalories per day 80.96 billion kilocalories per day 59.04 billion kilocalories per day South Africa
2010s 158.81 billion kilocalories per day 121.34 billion kilocalories per day 37.47 billion kilocalories per day South Africa
2020s 168.15 billion kilocalories per day 156.56 billion kilocalories per day 11.60 billion kilocalories per day South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, South Africa or Tanzania?
South Africa, at 170.29 billion kilocalories per day against 167.76 billion kilocalories per day in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between South Africa and Tanzania?
2.52 billion kilocalories per day, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Tanzania rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
South Africa ranks 26th and Tanzania ranks 27th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Tanzania: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/south-africa/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/south-africa/tanzania/">South Africa vs Tanzania: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.