Mozambique vs Romania: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Mozambique
73.53 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Romania
69.76 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Mozambique rank
53rd
Romania rank
55th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Mozambique
  • Romania
20.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 73.53 billion kilocalories per day against 69.76 billion kilocalories per day in Romania, a difference of 3.77 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Mozambique ranks 53rd and Romania ranks 55th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 15.59 billion kilocalories per day 56.51 billion kilocalories per day 40.93 billion kilocalories per day Romania
1970s 19.52 billion kilocalories per day 66.32 billion kilocalories per day 46.80 billion kilocalories per day Romania
1980s 23.03 billion kilocalories per day 68.68 billion kilocalories per day 45.65 billion kilocalories per day Romania
1990s 28.88 billion kilocalories per day 69.17 billion kilocalories per day 40.29 billion kilocalories per day Romania
2000s 43.11 billion kilocalories per day 73.93 billion kilocalories per day 30.82 billion kilocalories per day Romania
2010s 55.37 billion kilocalories per day 69.71 billion kilocalories per day 14.34 billion kilocalories per day Romania
2020s 70.81 billion kilocalories per day 70.47 billion kilocalories per day 335.62 million kilocalories per day Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Mozambique or Romania?
Mozambique, at 73.53 billion kilocalories per day against 69.76 billion kilocalories per day in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Mozambique and Romania?
3.77 billion kilocalories per day, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Romania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Romania rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Mozambique ranks 53rd and Romania ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Romania: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/mozambique/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/mozambique/romania/">Mozambique vs Romania: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.