Morocco vs Myanmar: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Morocco
126.48 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Myanmar
152.06 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Morocco rank
35th
Myanmar rank
32nd

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Morocco
  • Myanmar
50.0B100.0B150.0B196119922023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 152.06 billion kilocalories per day against 126.48 billion kilocalories per day in Morocco, a difference of 25.58 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.

Morocco ranks 35th and Myanmar ranks 32nd of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 30.36 billion kilocalories per day 35.91 billion kilocalories per day 5.55 billion kilocalories per day Myanmar
1970s 44.44 billion kilocalories per day 45.41 billion kilocalories per day 970.30 million kilocalories per day Myanmar
1980s 63.13 billion kilocalories per day 61.66 billion kilocalories per day 1.46 billion kilocalories per day Morocco
1990s 80.63 billion kilocalories per day 79.37 billion kilocalories per day 1.26 billion kilocalories per day Morocco
2000s 96.30 billion kilocalories per day 107.32 billion kilocalories per day 11.03 billion kilocalories per day Myanmar
2010s 115.64 billion kilocalories per day 139.83 billion kilocalories per day 24.19 billion kilocalories per day Myanmar
2020s 124.54 billion kilocalories per day 151.31 billion kilocalories per day 26.77 billion kilocalories per day Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Morocco or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 152.06 billion kilocalories per day against 126.48 billion kilocalories per day in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Morocco and Myanmar?
25.58 billion kilocalories per day, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Myanmar rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Morocco ranks 35th and Myanmar ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Myanmar: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/morocco/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/morocco/myanmar/">Morocco vs Myanmar: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.