Mexico vs Nigeria: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Mexico
428.73 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Nigeria
562.90 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Mexico rank
11th
Nigeria rank
8th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Mexico
  • Nigeria
100.0B200.0B300.0B400.0B500.0B600.0B196119922023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 562.90 billion kilocalories per day against 428.73 billion kilocalories per day in Mexico, a difference of 134.16 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.3 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 11th and Nigeria ranks 8th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 4 and Nigeria in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 108.80 billion kilocalories per day 95.67 billion kilocalories per day 13.13 billion kilocalories per day Mexico
1970s 162.86 billion kilocalories per day 113.91 billion kilocalories per day 48.94 billion kilocalories per day Mexico
1980s 235.47 billion kilocalories per day 158.90 billion kilocalories per day 76.58 billion kilocalories per day Mexico
1990s 281.60 billion kilocalories per day 268.96 billion kilocalories per day 12.63 billion kilocalories per day Mexico
2000s 339.21 billion kilocalories per day 369.04 billion kilocalories per day 29.83 billion kilocalories per day Nigeria
2010s 381.14 billion kilocalories per day 478.13 billion kilocalories per day 96.99 billion kilocalories per day Nigeria
2020s 419.46 billion kilocalories per day 554.10 billion kilocalories per day 134.65 billion kilocalories per day Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Mexico or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 562.90 billion kilocalories per day against 428.73 billion kilocalories per day in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Mexico and Nigeria?
134.16 billion kilocalories per day, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Nigeria rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Mexico ranks 11th and Nigeria ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Nigeria: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/mexico/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/mexico/nigeria/">Mexico vs Nigeria: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.