Mauritania vs Panama: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Mauritania
14.61 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Panama
13.84 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Mauritania rank
123rd
Panama rank
124th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Mauritania
  • Panama
05.0B10.0B15.0B196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 14.61 billion kilocalories per day against 13.84 billion kilocalories per day in Panama, a difference of 769.60 million kilocalories per day.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Mauritania ranks 123rd and Panama ranks 124th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 2.15 billion kilocalories per day 2.87 billion kilocalories per day 718.73 million kilocalories per day Panama
1970s 2.63 billion kilocalories per day 3.84 billion kilocalories per day 1.21 billion kilocalories per day Panama
1980s 4.19 billion kilocalories per day 5.06 billion kilocalories per day 870.93 million kilocalories per day Panama
1990s 5.97 billion kilocalories per day 6.20 billion kilocalories per day 234.01 million kilocalories per day Panama
2000s 8.30 billion kilocalories per day 7.87 billion kilocalories per day 429.14 million kilocalories per day Mauritania
2010s 11.33 billion kilocalories per day 11.17 billion kilocalories per day 160.35 million kilocalories per day Mauritania
2020s 14.00 billion kilocalories per day 13.43 billion kilocalories per day 576.55 million kilocalories per day Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Mauritania or Panama?
Mauritania, at 14.61 billion kilocalories per day against 13.84 billion kilocalories per day in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Mauritania and Panama?
769.60 million kilocalories per day, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Panama rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Mauritania ranks 123rd and Panama ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Panama: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/mauritania/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/mauritania/panama/">Mauritania vs Panama: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.