Malta vs Suriname: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Malta
1.82 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Suriname
1.60 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Malta rank
162nd
Suriname rank
164th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Malta
  • Suriname
500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B1.5B1.8B196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 1.82 billion kilocalories per day against 1.60 billion kilocalories per day in Suriname, a difference of 218.79 million kilocalories per day.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 162nd and Suriname ranks 164th of 191 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 920.31 million kilocalories per day 705.64 million kilocalories per day 214.67 million kilocalories per day Malta
1970s 987.94 million kilocalories per day 824.34 million kilocalories per day 163.60 million kilocalories per day Malta
1980s 1.09 billion kilocalories per day 936.09 million kilocalories per day 152.70 million kilocalories per day Malta
1990s 1.26 billion kilocalories per day 1.10 billion kilocalories per day 168.77 million kilocalories per day Malta
2000s 1.39 billion kilocalories per day 1.29 billion kilocalories per day 104.96 million kilocalories per day Malta
2010s 1.56 billion kilocalories per day 1.53 billion kilocalories per day 28.50 million kilocalories per day Malta
2020s 1.76 billion kilocalories per day 1.61 billion kilocalories per day 152.41 million kilocalories per day Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Malta or Suriname?
Malta, at 1.82 billion kilocalories per day against 1.60 billion kilocalories per day in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Malta and Suriname?
218.79 million kilocalories per day, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Suriname rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Malta ranks 162nd and Suriname ranks 164th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Suriname: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/malta/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/malta/suriname/">Malta vs Suriname: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.