Maldives vs Suriname: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Maldives
1.41 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Suriname
1.60 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Maldives rank
167th
Suriname rank
164th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Maldives
  • Suriname
0500.0M1.0B1.5B196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 1.60 billion kilocalories per day against 1.41 billion kilocalories per day in Maldives, a difference of 191.68 million kilocalories per day.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Maldives ranks 167th and Suriname ranks 164th of 191 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 165.81 million kilocalories per day 705.64 million kilocalories per day 539.83 million kilocalories per day Suriname
1970s 247.73 million kilocalories per day 824.34 million kilocalories per day 576.61 million kilocalories per day Suriname
1980s 418.92 million kilocalories per day 936.09 million kilocalories per day 517.17 million kilocalories per day Suriname
1990s 584.06 million kilocalories per day 1.10 billion kilocalories per day 511.75 million kilocalories per day Suriname
2000s 732.52 million kilocalories per day 1.29 billion kilocalories per day 556.56 million kilocalories per day Suriname
2010s 1.13 billion kilocalories per day 1.53 billion kilocalories per day 401.26 million kilocalories per day Suriname
2020s 1.37 billion kilocalories per day 1.61 billion kilocalories per day 242.83 million kilocalories per day Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Maldives or Suriname?
Suriname, at 1.60 billion kilocalories per day against 1.41 billion kilocalories per day in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Maldives and Suriname?
191.68 million kilocalories per day, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Maldives and Suriname rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Maldives ranks 167th and Suriname ranks 164th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Suriname: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/maldives/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/maldives/suriname/">Maldives vs Suriname: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.