Malawi vs Sri Lanka: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Malawi
55.26 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Sri Lanka
61.45 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Malawi rank
65th
Sri Lanka rank
63rd

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Malawi
  • Sri Lanka
020.0B40.0B60.0B196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 61.45 billion kilocalories per day against 55.26 billion kilocalories per day in Malawi, a difference of 6.19 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 65th and Sri Lanka ranks 63rd of 191 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 8.67 billion kilocalories per day 24.88 billion kilocalories per day 16.21 billion kilocalories per day Sri Lanka
1970s 12.38 billion kilocalories per day 30.20 billion kilocalories per day 17.82 billion kilocalories per day Sri Lanka
1980s 15.40 billion kilocalories per day 36.44 billion kilocalories per day 21.03 billion kilocalories per day Sri Lanka
1990s 19.97 billion kilocalories per day 40.39 billion kilocalories per day 20.41 billion kilocalories per day Sri Lanka
2000s 28.70 billion kilocalories per day 46.87 billion kilocalories per day 18.17 billion kilocalories per day Sri Lanka
2010s 43.52 billion kilocalories per day 57.07 billion kilocalories per day 13.55 billion kilocalories per day Sri Lanka
2020s 53.30 billion kilocalories per day 63.66 billion kilocalories per day 10.36 billion kilocalories per day Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Malawi or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 61.45 billion kilocalories per day against 55.26 billion kilocalories per day in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Malawi and Sri Lanka?
6.19 billion kilocalories per day, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Sri Lanka rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Malawi ranks 65th and Sri Lanka ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Sri Lanka: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/malawi/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/malawi/sri-lanka/">Malawi vs Sri Lanka: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.