North Korea vs Malawi: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

North Korea
51.37 billion kilocalories per day
in 2018
Malawi
55.26 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
North Korea rank
68th
Malawi rank
65th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • North Korea
  • Malawi
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B60.0B196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 55.26 billion kilocalories per day against 51.37 billion kilocalories per day in North Korea, a difference of 3.89 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times North Korea's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, North Korea has been ahead every year.

North Korea ranks 68th and Malawi ranks 65th of 191 countries.

North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Korea Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 25.10 billion kilocalories per day 8.67 billion kilocalories per day 16.43 billion kilocalories per day North Korea
1970s 34.49 billion kilocalories per day 12.38 billion kilocalories per day 22.11 billion kilocalories per day North Korea
1980s 39.83 billion kilocalories per day 15.40 billion kilocalories per day 24.42 billion kilocalories per day North Korea
1990s 47.36 billion kilocalories per day 19.97 billion kilocalories per day 27.38 billion kilocalories per day North Korea
2000s 50.73 billion kilocalories per day 28.70 billion kilocalories per day 22.03 billion kilocalories per day North Korea
2010s 52.05 billion kilocalories per day 42.92 billion kilocalories per day 9.13 billion kilocalories per day North Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, North Korea or Malawi?
Malawi, at 55.26 billion kilocalories per day against 51.37 billion kilocalories per day in North Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between North Korea and Malawi?
3.89 billion kilocalories per day, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
How do North Korea and Malawi rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
North Korea ranks 68th and Malawi ranks 65th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Korea vs Malawi: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/korea-dem-people-s-rep/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/korea-dem-people-s-rep/malawi/">North Korea vs Malawi: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.