Kenya vs Saudi Arabia: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Kenya
118.76 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
121.74 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Kenya rank
38th
Saudi Arabia rank
37th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Kenya
  • Saudi Arabia
025.0B50.0B75.0B100.0B125.0B196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 121.74 billion kilocalories per day against 118.76 billion kilocalories per day in Kenya, a difference of 2.98 billion kilocalories per day.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.

Kenya ranks 38th and Saudi Arabia ranks 37th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 6 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 21.67 billion kilocalories per day 8.87 billion kilocalories per day 12.81 billion kilocalories per day Kenya
1970s 31.02 billion kilocalories per day 14.67 billion kilocalories per day 16.36 billion kilocalories per day Kenya
1980s 42.09 billion kilocalories per day 35.46 billion kilocalories per day 6.63 billion kilocalories per day Kenya
1990s 54.54 billion kilocalories per day 52.32 billion kilocalories per day 2.23 billion kilocalories per day Kenya
2000s 73.99 billion kilocalories per day 72.22 billion kilocalories per day 1.77 billion kilocalories per day Kenya
2010s 103.11 billion kilocalories per day 101.27 billion kilocalories per day 1.83 billion kilocalories per day Kenya
2020s 116.91 billion kilocalories per day 118.86 billion kilocalories per day 1.95 billion kilocalories per day Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Kenya or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 121.74 billion kilocalories per day against 118.76 billion kilocalories per day in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Kenya and Saudi Arabia?
2.98 billion kilocalories per day, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Saudi Arabia rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Kenya ranks 38th and Saudi Arabia ranks 37th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Saudi Arabia: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/kenya/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/kenya/saudi-arabia/">Kenya vs Saudi Arabia: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.