Italy vs South Korea: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Italy
223.28 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
South Korea
177.52 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Italy rank
22nd
South Korea rank
25th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Italy
  • South Korea
50.0B100.0B150.0B200.0B196119922023

How they compare

Italy currently reports 223.28 billion kilocalories per day against 177.52 billion kilocalories per day in South Korea, a difference of 45.77 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.3 times South Korea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Italy ranks 22nd and South Korea ranks 25th of 191 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy South Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 161.93 billion kilocalories per day 67.82 billion kilocalories per day 94.11 billion kilocalories per day Italy
1970s 190.10 billion kilocalories per day 104.66 billion kilocalories per day 85.44 billion kilocalories per day Italy
1980s 197.13 billion kilocalories per day 120.62 billion kilocalories per day 76.51 billion kilocalories per day Italy
1990s 203.50 billion kilocalories per day 133.72 billion kilocalories per day 69.78 billion kilocalories per day Italy
2000s 212.10 billion kilocalories per day 146.43 billion kilocalories per day 65.67 billion kilocalories per day Italy
2010s 216.47 billion kilocalories per day 168.69 billion kilocalories per day 47.78 billion kilocalories per day Italy
2020s 221.06 billion kilocalories per day 176.71 billion kilocalories per day 44.35 billion kilocalories per day Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Italy or South Korea?
Italy, at 223.28 billion kilocalories per day against 177.52 billion kilocalories per day in South Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Italy and South Korea?
45.77 billion kilocalories per day, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and South Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Italy and South Korea rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Italy ranks 22nd and South Korea ranks 25th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs South Korea: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/italy/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/italy/korea-rep/">Italy vs South Korea: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.