Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Guinea
42.46 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Zimbabwe
39.11 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Guinea rank
74th
Zimbabwe rank
76th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B196119922023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 42.46 billion kilocalories per day against 39.11 billion kilocalories per day in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.35 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Guinea ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 7.73 billion kilocalories per day 9.68 billion kilocalories per day 1.95 billion kilocalories per day Zimbabwe
1970s 9.41 billion kilocalories per day 13.97 billion kilocalories per day 4.55 billion kilocalories per day Zimbabwe
1980s 12.22 billion kilocalories per day 18.48 billion kilocalories per day 6.26 billion kilocalories per day Zimbabwe
1990s 17.78 billion kilocalories per day 22.71 billion kilocalories per day 4.93 billion kilocalories per day Zimbabwe
2000s 23.37 billion kilocalories per day 26.12 billion kilocalories per day 2.75 billion kilocalories per day Zimbabwe
2010s 30.48 billion kilocalories per day 30.76 billion kilocalories per day 282.91 million kilocalories per day Zimbabwe
2020s 40.08 billion kilocalories per day 36.91 billion kilocalories per day 3.16 billion kilocalories per day Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Guinea, at 42.46 billion kilocalories per day against 39.11 billion kilocalories per day in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Guinea and Zimbabwe?
3.35 billion kilocalories per day, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Guinea ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/guinea/zimbabwe/">Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.