Guatemala vs Senegal: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Guatemala
51.17 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Senegal
51.48 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Guatemala rank
69th
Senegal rank
67th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Guatemala
  • Senegal
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B196119922023

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 51.48 billion kilocalories per day against 51.17 billion kilocalories per day in Guatemala, a difference of 311.30 million kilocalories per day.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 69th and Senegal ranks 67th of 191 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Senegal Difference Ahead
1960s 9.20 billion kilocalories per day 8.89 billion kilocalories per day 306.94 million kilocalories per day Guatemala
1970s 12.68 billion kilocalories per day 10.50 billion kilocalories per day 2.19 billion kilocalories per day Guatemala
1980s 17.55 billion kilocalories per day 14.34 billion kilocalories per day 3.22 billion kilocalories per day Guatemala
1990s 22.30 billion kilocalories per day 18.52 billion kilocalories per day 3.78 billion kilocalories per day Guatemala
2000s 29.55 billion kilocalories per day 25.45 billion kilocalories per day 4.10 billion kilocalories per day Guatemala
2010s 40.16 billion kilocalories per day 36.18 billion kilocalories per day 3.98 billion kilocalories per day Guatemala
2020s 49.06 billion kilocalories per day 48.30 billion kilocalories per day 762.75 million kilocalories per day Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Guatemala or Senegal?
Senegal, at 51.48 billion kilocalories per day against 51.17 billion kilocalories per day in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Guatemala and Senegal?
311.30 million kilocalories per day, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Senegal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Senegal rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Guatemala ranks 69th and Senegal ranks 67th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Senegal: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/guatemala/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/guatemala/senegal/">Guatemala vs Senegal: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.